A Security Council meeting is scheduled for today at 4.30 New York Time as the situation in Juba deteriorates, with a spokesman for Vice President Riek Machar warning that the country was ‘back to war.’
Source: What’s in Blue
Security Council members are set to meet today at 4:30 pm for urgent consultations on the situation in South Sudan. The meeting was requested by the US, the penholder on South Sudan, in light of the violence in Juba in recent days between forces loyal to President Salva Kiir (the Sudan People’s Liberation Army or SPLA) and First Vice President Riek Machar (the Sudan People’s Liberation Army in Opposition or SPLA-IO). Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations Hervé Ladsous is expected to brief.
The recent violence began on 7 July, reportedly when SPLA soldiers stopped and attempted to arrest members of Machar’s guard at a checkpoint in the Gudele section of Juba. Machar’s guard members resisted the arrest and a shootout ensued. Media reports have indicated that 5 SPLA soldiers were killed in the incident and that soldiers from both sides were injured. Also on 7 July, two US diplomatic vehicles were hit by gunfire, although no one was hurt in the incident. On the following day (8 July), fighting ensued around the presidential palace, the UNDP and EU compounds, and the airport road. The exact number of soldiers from both sides who have died in the clashes is unclear but media reports are citing up to 150. . The fighting displaced large numbers of civilians, and several thousand are reported to have sought refuge in UN facilities,
The Secretariat circulated a confidential briefing note to Council members on 8 July, which apparently described the fighting on 7 and 8 July in Juba, as well as recent tensions in Wau, where thousands of civilians have sought protection from fighting near an UNMISS base in recent weeks. In the note, the Secretariat apparently reported that Kiir, Machar and Vice President James Wanna Igga had met on 8 July to discuss the security situation in Juba and that they had called for calm in a televised joint press conference. An updated note circulated on 10 July apparently provided some information on UNMISS’ reaction to events.
In the context of this fluid security situation, Council members issued a press statement yesterday evening (9 July), in which they condemned the fighting in Juba on 7-8 July and urged the transitional government to take steps to end the fighting and reduce tensions. Russia, supported by China and Egypt, had broken silence earlier in the day on the initial version of the text. Among other things, Russia maintained that language “demanding” measures from the parties to quell the violence was not appropriate for a press statement. The language was softened as a compromise -i.e. “urged” and “called on” replaced “demanded” in the final version.
In spite of the call for calm by South Sudan’s leaders in the joint press conference, heavy fighting has continued today in Juba, with the SPLA and the SPLA-IO blaming each other for the escalating violence.
During today’s meeting, Council members will want to be updated on the security situation in Juba and what means can be pursued to quell the violence. In this context, there will most likely be interest in what interactions the political leadership of UNMISS has had with Kiir and Machar and other key political and military figures, and what messages have been transmitted to them with what responses. Members may ask to what extent command and control over armed forces is being exerted, and what means can be employed to exert leverage on those fighting to get them to stand down.
The recent violence has apparently caused the mission to institute its “crisis management mode”. Members may want to receive information on what steps the mission is taking to handle the influx of additional internally displaced persons in its Juba facilities, to protect other civilians, and to protect UN staff and their humanitarian partners. A number of Council members have long been concerned about the fragile security situation in South Sudan and the potential that fighting in Juba could jeopardise the entire peace process. It seems that a late 2015 confidential note on UNMISS contingency planning circulated to Council members noted that if large-scale violence broke out in Juba the mission would have difficulty protecting civilians, and would be engaged with protecting UN staff and its humanitarian partners. There is thus a sense of urgency regarding the need to address the escalating clashes to avoid the possibility that the country descends again into full scale civil war.
Looking ahead, this Wednesday (13 July), the Council is scheduled to hold a briefing and consultations on South Sudan prior to renewing the UNMISS mandate later this month. Today’s briefing, and events in South Sudan in the coming days, are expected to impact the content of Wednesday’s meeting and the negotiations on the mission’s mandate later this month.